BSA Owners' Club Workshop Discussions

The BSA Workshop => Twins => Topic started by: A10 JWO on 13 May, 2018, 17:50

Title: Rear brake issue.
Post by: A10 JWO on 13 May, 2018, 17:50
I fitted my newly built back wheel and fitted the brake pedal. Despite having loads of meat on the shoes I am taking up nearly all the adjustment on the brake road. The parts list shows 2 caps         
ref 41-6078 on the 1971 Version of the Thunderbolt. I did dismantle the brake plate when I had it aqua-blasted, BUT I cannot remember if the shoes were fitted with the caps when I assembled the hub. Do they make that much difference ? Thanks.
Title: Re: Rear brake issue.
Post by: JulianS on 13 May, 2018, 18:56
If they are original shoes then the pads are essential. They sit on the pivot end of the shoe and are about 1/16 inch thick so have a significant effect on brake geometry.

If the shoes are pattern items I do not know.
Title: Re: Rear brake issue.
Post by: ChrisG on 13 May, 2018, 20:21
Yes you will need them. They are a bit weird shaped which makes the edges that slip over the brake shoe 'clip' on, a bit like its got shoulder pads! The idea is the shoes become fully floating so centralise automatically. Note I use the word 'idea' as it should work in theory. In practice?????
Have a dig around in your box of bits and see if you find something close. If not they are available at places like Kidderminster M/Cs
Chris
Title: Re: Rear brake issue.
Post by: Servodyne on 13 May, 2018, 22:37
In my experience with the Conical rear brake, the standard BSA pivot pads 41-6078 are not thick enough. Consequentially the brake lever has to turn past 90 deg to the brake rod rod before it begins to bite. You can fit a Triumph modified pivot pad 37.4037 which has a plate spot welded onto it to increase the effective thickness and take up the 'slack'.
I think this will sort out your problem.
Title: Re: Rear brake issue.
Post by: JulianS on 14 May, 2018, 08:08
Triumph service bulletin showing the modified pivot pad.
Title: Re: Rear brake issue.
Post by: A10 JWO on 14 May, 2018, 17:26
All answers appreciated. I have looked at many photos of this model, all the brake adjusters seem to have taken up much slack. Hope fully this tread may also help others. I am considering ordering new shoes with the modified caps from a Triumph parts dealer as the conical hub should be identical on both BSA and Triumph in 1971-2.
Title: Re: Rear brake issue.
Post by: A10 JWO on 15 May, 2018, 15:38
I am sitting here with the brake plate next to me, the shoes have quite a bit of meat on them and are fitted with the caps 37-4018. The shoes are actually stamped MCD2 37-4018, can't be original, can they ? The problem remains, too much adjustment required. The drum looks good with no real sign of excessive wear. I have googled 37-4018 which is listed as correct. I am considering ordering new Bonneville Conical Hub shoes with the modified caps ( 37-4037 ). I thought I would throw this open to the readers first, thanks.
Title: Re: Rear brake issue.
Post by: Servodyne on 17 May, 2018, 08:52
I would just buy the modified pivot pads 37.4037 first.

I think that you'll find most of the slack disappears.
Title: Re: Rear brake issue.
Post by: A10 JWO on 17 May, 2018, 11:41
New shoes and modified pads arrived from SRM today, will let everyone know how it goes.
Title: Re: Rear brake issue.
Post by: A10 JWO on 19 May, 2018, 15:26
Fitted new shoes with modified Triumph pivot pads supplied by SRM ( £4.00 ). Could not get the brake plate back in the wheel. Tried with standard pads, still too much adjustment. I ground about just under 2 mm off the modified pads. Now have a very nice back brake, job done. Hope this helps someone else.