Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AWJDThumper

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 42
16
Singles / Re: C15 Wheel Offset
« on: 22 May, 2018, 12:06:06 »
I think either way is ok. I chose 17" simply because I restore bikes to their original factory spec.

17
Singles / Re: B40T swinging arm bushes...
« on: 22 May, 2018, 12:03:37 »
Just removed the spindle which drifted out quite easily with the minimum of heat needed. In my case, I needed to remove take the swinging arm apart in order to get the frame powder coated otherwise the trapped grease will cause a problem in the baking oven. Fortunately, the bushes don't need replacing although this is normally straightforward if you have the correct size reamer to use afterwards.

18
Twins / Re: A10 hub ?
« on: 22 May, 2018, 09:08:10 »
Just checked again and it came from the Goldstar Maintenance Manual.

19
Twins / Re: A10 hub ?
« on: 22 May, 2018, 07:53:40 »
The picture came from a B34 Goldstar owners instruction book.

20
I can see the rust bubbling up under areas of the paint and so a complete repair is probably the only long term solution. Now that you've cleaned out the inside of the tank, there's not going to be any petrol to worry about in terms of painting the tank.

21
Singles / Re: B40T swinging arm bushes...
« on: 22 May, 2018, 07:48:47 »
Use as much heat as you can on the frame around the swinging arm pivot. My frame is going to be powdered coated and so I can use a blow torch. If you want to protect the paintwork, use a hot air gun to raise the temperature as much as possible. As said, the main problem is breaking the initial stiction due to the pivot rusting in the frame. Once you start to get it moving, the job will become much easier.

22
Singles / Re: C15 Wheel Offset
« on: 22 May, 2018, 07:44:29 »
No Problem. What size rims are you going for: 17" or 18"?

23
Twins / Re: A10 hub ?
« on: 21 May, 2018, 18:03:25 »
I think the picture shows your hub. As can be seen, both bearings are retained on the inside by a shoulder on either side of the hub tunnel, and on the outside by locking rings. The push through spindle has a shoulder on it which tightens the bearing and brake plate against the fork leg when the spindle is tightened.

24
Singles / Re: C15 Wheel Offset
« on: 21 May, 2018, 17:33:48 »
It didn't want to remove the back wheel from my C15 but managed to measure the LH offset relative to the LH side of the full width hub (I managed to get a narrow straight edge between the hub and the chain wheel. The measured offset was 4mm which corresponds to the offset of the original wheel before the rebuild. With this offset, the tyre and rim appear to be centred relative the swinging arm bushes confirming it should be correct.

25
Singles / Re: B40T swinging arm bushes...
« on: 21 May, 2018, 17:27:04 »
They can be a pig to shift even with an otherwise bare frame. I found that with a 12T hydraulic press it can be very difficult to move the spindle even after a lot of heat has been applied. With the last one I did I found the most effective way of removing the spindle was with a suitable large drift and a club hammer - the impulsive force generated is surprisingly greater than the 12T generated by my press. I'm about to remove a spindle from a Bantam and will let you know how I get on. Once you've overcome the initial stiction, its then easier to get it moving.

26
Singles / Re: C15 Wheel Offset
« on: 20 May, 2018, 22:27:29 »
Adrian. I rebuilt a pair of 17" C15 wheels a few months ago and posted what the front wheel offset was a couple of weeks ago. From memory, the front LH wheel offset was 20mm measured from the LH end of the hub.  The link below should take you to my posting otherwise simply search for '20mm'. The back wheel is presently on the bike but I will see if I can measure the offset for you tomorrow.

https://www.bsaownersclub.co.uk/bsaoc_forum/index.php?topic=3171.msg15387#msg15387

27
Singles / Re: Primary chaincase oil level
« on: 20 May, 2018, 09:17:23 »
If memory serves me correctly, there is simply a hole drilled vertically down into the top of the level screw hole inside the primary cover. If the oil level is too high, oil simply seeps down through this vertical hole into the level screw hole to the outside of the cover. Using a wire to try to blindly poke through this hole might be a bit difficult. Short of taking the cover off, I might be tempted to take out the level screw and blow air into the hole from a foot pump or high pressure air gun in the hope of clearing any blockage in the small drain hole. However, there's no guarantee that the drain hole is actually there.

28
Singles / Re: Primary chaincase oil level
« on: 19 May, 2018, 14:17:03 »
In principle, it should be possible to poke a suitably bent piece of wire through the roof of the hole for the level screw in the primary cover, assuming the hole is actually there ::)

29
Singles / Re: Primary chaincase oil level
« on: 19 May, 2018, 08:15:10 »
If you've put 1/4 pint then there's nothing to worry about. However, are you removing the correct screw that acts as the level screw? If so, it's possible the oil hole to the screw is blocked.

30
Singles / Re: C15S 1959 Oil Pump total oil loss from oil tank
« on: 18 May, 2018, 09:13:08 »
What happens with most singles is that the engine is stopped from spinning after the ignition is switched off by the compression stroke - that is, it doesn't have the momentum to carry it past TDC on the compression stroke. At that point, the engine can bounce back and rotate backwards. In principle, if the kickstarter is depressed at that point, the backwards rotating engine could cause the lever to rotate upwards. Not sure if that was happening in your case but, if it was, it is probably perfectly normal and nothing to worry about (unless it hits the exhaust system!)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 42